Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference and Social Science
Andrew Gelman's blunt, running critique of bad statistics in research.
About
Andrew Gelman, a statistics professor at Columbia, has run this blog for close to two decades, and it's become required reading in parts of academia for its running commentary on bad statistics, failed replications, and sloppy causal claims in published research, often naming the specific paper or news story it's skewering.
The tone is blunt and occasionally combative, which has made it both influential and controversial among the researchers it criticizes. Best for people who work with data and statistics professionally and want a sharp, if sometimes cranky, watchdog on how research actually gets done.
Similar to Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference and Social Science
See all alternatives →Marginal Revolution
Tyler Cowen and Alex Tabarrok on everything economics touches.
Conversable Economist
Timothy Taylor on economic research, made readable.
ProMarket
The Stigler Center's sharp-elbowed commentary on competition and regulation.
Econbrowser
James Hamilton and Menzie Chinn's long-running academic take on macroeconomic data
Log in to save
Create a free account or log in to save this for later and find it anytime on your Saved page.
Log in or sign up